Who could possibly expect to benefit from Nemtsov's assassination?
We have seen already that this murder could on balance harm President Putin and his project for Russia. On the other hand, the men in the shadows who constitute the real government of the USA (one of these of men alone, David Rockefeller, has certainly more power, by far, than the combined executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the American government). These bankers, generals, and spooks, are clearly pursuing world domination. For them, Russia is what Carthage was to Rome's Cato the Elder. Russia under Putin's leadership is acting forcefully, fearlessly, and yet moderately in world affairs, and has recently stopped the conquest of Syria and the transformation of Crimea into an American military base. These shadowy figures clearly want Putin out of the way. If nothing else works, sooner or later they will surely assassinate him, but such a step would involve some unwelcome risks. "
...
Needless to say too, unscrupulousness is entirely in character for the American government. Rulers that killed, say, over one-quarter of a century, 2.5 million Iraqis on false pretenses, brought total chaos to this ancient and proud civilization, and left behind, forever, an environmental wasteland, are capable of any crimes whatsoever. They would kill 1,000,000,000 Nemtsovs to achieve their goals, without once blinking an eye or suffering a single sleepless night.
So, in my view, the probability that the Russian government is behind the killing of Boris Nemtsov is close to zero, while the probability of involvement of the CIA and its allies and stooges is well over 90%.
and:
Blog: What if Putin didn't have Nemtsov killed?: "most other observers of Russia assume that the Latin adage “cui bono?” (“who benefits?”) is enough to presume responsibility for the death of Boris Nemtsov belongs to Vladimir Putin. But if this is a sanctioned "termination with extreme prejudice," it's clumsy and unprofessional. Certainly not worthy of a president, former KGB colonel; indeed, a station chief in East Germany.
Surely too, it looks like a sponsored hit, but doing it where the Kremlin will be in every bit of news coverage raises some red flags. Surely, this doesn't benefit Putin personally or politically. If it's a false flag operation, a provocation, so far it's a success. No matter the culprit, the blood is again on the Putin brand. This is tragic and fishy at the same time. Boris, like Ukraine, might just be another pawn in the proxy wars, the regime change sweepstakes. Regime change, as I'm sure you have noticed, is the leitmotiv of the Obama era.
My guess is we will see this, like all lethal political machinations, through that "wilderness of mirrors." No matter what the investigation says, like Kiev, the damage is already done. The narrative here is unlikely to be undone by any post mortem facts or analysis.
If Putin or the FSB, had nothing to do with this incident, stand by for some serious blowback. Unlike Obama with Islamism, Vladimir and his supporters will not turn the other cheek gladly. Cold here, cold there, the world seems to be receding into another Cold War. The nuclear threshold is lowered once more in Europe. All unnecessary and all very sad."
"
Needless to say too, unscrupulousness is entirely in character for the American government. Rulers that killed, say, over one-quarter of a century, 2.5 million Iraqis on false pretenses, brought total chaos to this ancient and proud civilization, and left behind, forever, an environmental wasteland, are capable of any crimes whatsoever. They would kill 1,000,000,000 Nemtsovs to achieve their goals, without once blinking an eye or suffering a single sleepless night.
So, in my view, the probability that the Russian government is behind the killing of Boris Nemtsov is close to zero, while the probability of involvement of the CIA and its allies and stooges is well over 90%.
and:
Blog: What if Putin didn't have Nemtsov killed?: "most other observers of Russia assume that the Latin adage “cui bono?” (“who benefits?”) is enough to presume responsibility for the death of Boris Nemtsov belongs to Vladimir Putin. But if this is a sanctioned "termination with extreme prejudice," it's clumsy and unprofessional. Certainly not worthy of a president, former KGB colonel; indeed, a station chief in East Germany.
Surely too, it looks like a sponsored hit, but doing it where the Kremlin will be in every bit of news coverage raises some red flags. Surely, this doesn't benefit Putin personally or politically. If it's a false flag operation, a provocation, so far it's a success. No matter the culprit, the blood is again on the Putin brand. This is tragic and fishy at the same time. Boris, like Ukraine, might just be another pawn in the proxy wars, the regime change sweepstakes. Regime change, as I'm sure you have noticed, is the leitmotiv of the Obama era.
My guess is we will see this, like all lethal political machinations, through that "wilderness of mirrors." No matter what the investigation says, like Kiev, the damage is already done. The narrative here is unlikely to be undone by any post mortem facts or analysis.
If Putin or the FSB, had nothing to do with this incident, stand by for some serious blowback. Unlike Obama with Islamism, Vladimir and his supporters will not turn the other cheek gladly. Cold here, cold there, the world seems to be receding into another Cold War. The nuclear threshold is lowered once more in Europe. All unnecessary and all very sad."
'via Blog this'
We know the assassination principle since WW1.
 |
| WW3 Allies & Axis 255 million deaths http://future.wikia.com/wiki/Scenario:_World_War_III_(Obama_vs._Putin) |
